Share
Download the PDF submission or read on this page.
19 September 2022
The Treasurer
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT 2600
Cc: Minister for Finance
Minister for Home Affairs
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
Dear Treasurer,
RE: OCTOBER 2022 FEDERAL BUDGET
The St Vincent de Paul Society National Council of Australia (the Society) is a lay Catholic charitable
organisation that comprises over 45,000 volunteers and members and 6,000 employees who provide
on the ground assistance across Australia. Our members and volunteers work directly with those in
need by giving them a hand up so they can achieve their full potential.
We acknowledge the assistance provided by the Australian Government to help many Australians and
businesses stay afloat including the Pandemic Leave Disaster Payment, the temporary cut to the fuel
excise and disaster recovery payments.
However, with rising interest rates and cost of living pressures, the Society is witnessing increased
demand for assistance to cover the necessities of life.
For instance, more people on the disability and aged pensions are seeking assistance because these
groups take longer to recover from COVID and flu, making it difficult to cover increased food and
delivery costs. Most city locations have reported their busiest periods since before the pandemic.
Regional Australia is now experiencing extreme accommodation shortages, where housing was once
affordable. And we remain concerned that rising interest rates will be passed on to renters, with the
burden of increased living expenses not fully realised until around Christmas time.
There are several key social policy issues that if addressed through this Budget would significantly
improve the lives of many Australians and, at the same time, stimulate economic growth and
productivity.
Around 830,000 people on JobSeeker are living $150 below the poverty line each fortnight.
The previous Government’s increase to the base rate of JobSeeker of $50 per fortnight (or $44 per
day), represents just 41 percent of the minimum wage and 27 percent of the average wage and puts
the unemployment payment back to where it was in 2007. (1) It leaves the unemployed on a payment
rate around 33 percent less than the poverty line. (2)
We know every dollar the Government invests in JobSeeker generates a significant economic return
and that providing people without paid work with enough to get by is a highly effective economic
stimulus, as they have little choice but to spend straight away on essentials. (3)
Yet working age payments have not kept up with the cost of living and Australia’s unemployment
payment rates are amongst the lowest out of 37 members of the OECD. (4) Further, the situation is likely
to worsen as inflation, interest rates and cost of living continue to rise, leaving wage growth further
behind.
Nearly 60 percent of JobSeeker, PPS and YA recipients have capacity to work in excess of 30 hours
per week and just over one-in-five of these recipients received earnings from employment in the last
fortnight (June 2022). An increase in the earnings threshold, similar to that recently announced for
aged pensioners, would encourage income support recipients to earn extra income, gain experience
and transition to full time work.
The base rate of working age payments should also be increased. A $23 per day increase would bring
these payments into line with pensions. Even a more modest increase of either $10 or $15 per day
would lift a significant number of people out of poverty. This cost could be met though minor increases
to the capital gains tax and superannuation tax systems and by rescinding the stage 3 tax cuts.
During the pandemic, many people on temporary visas sought the Society’s assistance, often for the
first time and mainly because they had access to little or no safety net.
People seeking asylum, who are still waiting for the government to recognise them as refugees, get
the least help. (5) Changes to the eligibility criteria for the SRSS program have seen an 85 percent
funding cut over five years and recipient numbers drop from around 13,000 to under 2,000 now.
Research shows that almost four in five of these people are at risk of homelessness and only one in
five are actually ‘job ready’, although much higher numbers are deemed so. The overall result of
changes to the SRSS has been a shift in welfare costs and responsibilities from federal to state
agencies and community-based organisations, at an estimated cost of between $80 to $120 million
per year. (6)
While one-off emergency relief payments are available, they do little to prevent people from becoming
homeless, living in over-crowded conditions or falling into destitution. During the pandemic, the
homelessness rate for people seeking asylum was estimated to increase to over 12 percent, affecting
14,000 people at an additional cost of $181 million in health, justice, social and other services. (7) Almost
90 percent of people seeking asylum and requiring assistance from agencies reported difficulty with
paying rent. Over 70 percent went without meals and around three-quarters had difficulty paying their
utilities. (8)
Addressing the skills shortage and reducing Government costs could be addressed on one fell swoop
by expediting the implementation of ALP policy and adopting a different approach to people seeking
asylum.
There are 19,345 people on SHEV/TPVs (April 2022) who could be quickly granted permanent
residency. The Kaldor Centre makes 17 recommendations to expedite this process while ensuring
everyone is treated fairly and no one falls through the cracks. (9) This group includes people who
currently hold or who have previously held a SHEV/TPV, people who have previously applied for, and
been refused a SHEV/TPV and people still waiting for a determination of their visa.
People found to be refugees have been granted either a TPV or SHEV, but the process takes on
average six years and pathways to permanency have failed. The estimated cost to Government of
reprocessing protection claims is at least $300 million. (10) Further, appeals to the Federal Court involve
significant staff and legal resources as applicants are often self-represented and may have limited
English. (11) Savings from these exercises should be redirected to the SRSS and provision of legal and
support services.
The Kaldor Centre estimates the 2021 annual cost, per person, to the Australian Government of
detaining and/or processing refugees and asylum seekers was:
Houses are unaffordable and rental properties have skyrocketed, particularly in regional Australia
where they have risen 12.5 percent in the last year.
Commonwealth Rent Assistance (CRA) has not kept up with these rental increases.
There are 956,000 households living in housing affordability stress in Australia. Commonwealth Rent
Assistance (CRA) reduces this number to 758,000. (13) However, AHURI research has found that
improvements to CRA’s eligibility requirements would generate savings that could be redirected to
better assist those in need. This includes the one-third of CRA recipients whose housing costs
currently exceed 30 percent of their income, even after CRA is deducted from rents; or the 246,000 or
18 per cent of low-income private renters who pay rents that exceed 30 per cent of their income but
are ineligible for CRA. (14)
The Society supports National Shelter Australia and ACOSS’ call for an increase to the maximum rate
of CRA by 50 percent. The Society calls for the stage 3 tax cuts to be rescinded. The cost of
increasing CRA could be met by minor changes to superannuation and capital gains tax regimes as
outlined in ANU’s A Fairer Tax and Welfare System in Australia CSRM Research Note 1/22.
Thank you for considering our submission. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further
information.
Yours sincerely
Toby oConnor
Chief Executive Officer
1. Coates. Cowgill. 25 February 2021. Now is an especially bad time to cut unemployment benefits. Grattan
Institute.
Accessed at: https://grattan.edu.au/news/now-is-an-especially-bad-time-to-cut-unemployment-benefits/
2. Jericho.G. 7 February 2021.Philip Lowe is right. Raising jobseeker is not just about good economics, it's about fairness. The Guardian.
Accessed at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/commentisfree/2021/feb/07/philip-lowe-is-right-raising-jobseeker-isnot-just-about-good-economics-its-about-fairness
3. ACOSS media release. 15 September 2020. Cuts to JobSeeker to cost 145,000 full-time jobs - Deloitte report, with reference to Nicki Hutley Deloitte Access Economic Partner.
4. Coates. Cowgill. op.cit.
5. Refugee Council of Australia. 25 April 2020. Information about money you can get from the government.
Accessed at: https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/money-info/
6. Van Kooy, J., Ward, T., Sept 2018. An Unnecessary Penalty: Economic impacts of changes to the Status
Resolution Support Services. Commissioned by Refugee Council of Australia in partnership with 10 other
community-based organisations.
Accessed at: https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/srss-economic-penalty/2/
7. Van Kooy. J. ibid.
8. Refugee Council of Australia. 18 December 2020. Homelessness and Hunger Among People Seeking Asylum
During COVID-19.
Accessed at: https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/homelessness-and-hunger-amongpeople-seeking-asylum-during-covid-19/
9. Kenny, M. Procter. N. Grech.C. June 2022. Temporary Protection Visas in Australia: A reform proposal. Policy Brief 13. UNSW.
Accessed at:
extension://elhekieabhbkpmcefcoobjddigjcaadp/https://www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/files/Policy_Brief_13_Temporary_Protection_Visas_Australia_Reform_Proposal.pdf
10. Kooy. J. September 2021. Supporting Economic Growth in Uncertain Times: Permanent Pathways for
Temporary Protection Visa and Safe Haven Enterprise Visa Holders. Policy Options Paper.
Accessed at:
https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2021-09/apo-nid314128.pdf, 2.
11. Kenny, M. Procter. N. Grech. C. June 2022. op. cit. p. 7.
12. Kaldor Centre. 26 April 2022. The Cost of Australia’s Asylum and Refugee Policies: A Source Guide. UNSW.
Accessed at: https://www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/publication/cost-australias-asylum-policy#:~:text=In%20the%202018-
19%20financial%20year%20the%20annual%20cost%2C,to%20live%20in%20community%20detention%20in%20Australia%3B%20and
13. Leishman, C., Ong, R., Lester, L. and Liang, W. 2020. Supporting Australia’s housing system: modelling
pandemic policy responses. AHURI Final Report No. 346. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute
Limited Melbourne.
Accessed at: https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/finalreports/346, doi:
10.18408/ahuri3125701.
14. Ong, R., Pawson, H., Singh, R. and Martin, C. 2020. Demand-side assistance in Australia’s rental housing
market: exploring reform option. AHURI Final Report No. 342. Australian Housing and Urban Research
Institute Limited Melbourne.
Accessed at: https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/finalreports/342, doi:
10.18408/ahuri8120801
Share this page