Share
Download the PDF document here or read the submission on this page.
25 January 2023
The Hon Dr Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer
Commonwealth of Australia
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT 2600
cc: Minister for Finance, Minister for Home Affairs
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
Dear Treasurer,
RE: PRE-FEDERAL BUDGET 2023
The St Vincent de Paul Society National Council of Australia (the Society) is a lay Catholic charitable
organisation of over 45,000 members and volunteers and 6,000 employees who provide support to
Australians in need. Our members and volunteers work in their local communities directly with people
in need by giving them a ‘hand up’ and helping them get back on their feet so they can achieve their
full potential.
During the COVID-19 lockdown years and following, Australians have been exposed to social
isolation, financial hardships including cost of living and housing pressures, and natural disasters.
Despite recent government efforts of assistance through temporary cuts to the fuel excise and disaster
recovery payments, the Society has continued to witness growing demand, up 20 per cent in New
South Wales alone.
Our analysis over the past decades identifies key social policies areas that are driving persistent levels
of poverty and disadvantage. The Society believes that additional funding could address this
disadvantage while stimulating economic growth.
These social policy areas include increasing the base rate of income support payments and the
income threshold for income support recipients, funding the Status Resolution Support Service,
increasing Commonwealth Rent Assistance and finding a replacement for the successful National
Rental Affordability Scheme.
High inflation, rising interest rates and cost of living pressures are weighing on households’ income
and expenditure. Those most adversely affected are income support recipients. There are currently
923,530 Australians on JobSeeker and Youth Allowance (December 2022). The Society is aware that
households relying on income support are five times more likely to experience poverty. Each year we
provide over $50 million in emergency relief assistance to cover people’s basic needs.
Although Australia is a wealthy country, our unemployment payment rates remain amongst the lowest
out of thirty-seven members of the OECD. (1)
A recent Anglicare Report (2) found that while unemployment is low, long-term unemployment has barely
budged. One in ten people do not have recent experience or qualifications, or they have other barriers
to work. These Australians spend around five years looking for work.
A recent Oxfam Report (3) found that inequality is increasing in Australia, with the richest one per cent
gaining 10 times more wealth in the past decade than the bottom 50 per cent. Further, extreme wealth
and poverty have increased simultaneously for the first time in 25 years.
Even with the recent Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase, JobSeeker is around $48 a day, leaving
recipients below the poverty line and surviving on only 42 per cent of the minimum wage. This is well
short of what is needed to cover the basics – filling a small car with petrol costs around $80, and
weekly rents have skyrocketed, particularly in regional Australia where they have risen 12.5 per cent in
the last year.
We appreciate that when the Australian Labor Party (ALP) supported the Coalition Government’s tax
cuts in 2019, the nation was in a very different economic environment. In 2023, the Society’s position
is that the Stage 3 tax cuts must be rescinded. Drawing on these savings would enable the base rate
of working age payments to be increased.
Fifty-nine per cent of JobSeeker and Youth Allowance recipients have capacity to work in excess of 30
hours per week and just under one-in-four (23 per cent) of these recipients received earnings from
employment in the last fortnight (December 2022). An increase in the earnings threshold, similar to
that recently announced for aged pensioners, would incentivise income support recipients to earn
extra income, gain experience and transition to full time work.
In April 2022, the Society commissioned the ANU’s Centre for Social Research and Methods to model
reforms to the Australian tax and welfare systems. The reforms are modest, do not involve a major
overhaul of the systems and would be effective in reducing inequality that exists between Australian
households. Importantly, the Society adopted a balanced budget approach as the foundation for the
social policy reforms we believe will bring about a fairer Australia for the many Australians living in
poverty and unable to secure safe and affordable housing.
Three options to deliver a fairer Australia by lifting people out of poverty are outlined in A Fairer Tax
and Welfare System in Australia (CSRM Research Note 1/22). The options are paid for by moderate
increases in capital gains tax, restructuring the superannuation tax system and indexing income
thresholds against income growth, rather than the Stage 3 tax cuts.
Following the 2023 Federal Election, the Society has commissioned ANU to update its modelling, with
amendments to assumptions and maps to demonstrate the change in poverty levels by electorate that
could be achieved through taxation reform. The updated report is expected around March 2023.
People seeking asylum in Australia, and waiting for the Government to recognise their claim, receive
the least amount of government help (4) as they have access to little or no social safety net. One of the
few forms of support available is the Status Resolution Support Service (SRSS) which provides a
basic living allowance (around 89% of JobSeeker), limited casework support and sometimes access to
torture and trauma counselling. However, as outlined by the Refugee Council of Australia (ROA), funding to the SRSS was cut by 8 per cent (from $245 million in 2016-17 to $36.9. million in 2022-23). This, along with narrowing eligibility criteria, has resulted in recipient numbers falling from over 13,000 in early 2018 to around 1,900 in 2022. The narrow eligibility criteria and lack of clarity mean the SRSS is benefitting few clients and is administratively burdensome.
People seeking asylum experience years-long wait for decisions. On average, there is a two year wait
for a departmental primary decision, and over six years for a review of decisions at the review tribunal.
If people cannot work because of health conditions or caring responsibilities, they are left with no form
of income for long periods.
Changes to the SRSS have resulted in welfare costs and responsibilities being shifted from federal to
state agencies and community-based organisations, at an estimated cost of between $80 to $120
million per year. (5) Charities are often left to fill the gaps but even with the best of intentions, it is not
possible to provide asylum seekers with a basic income for years on end.
For example, the Society in Canberra-Goulburn works with two other refugee support organisations to
assist around 70 households with accommodation support and living allowances and while the ACT
Government provides some financial support, this ends on 30 June 2023.
A small group of Society members in Goulburn Valley (Victoria) are assisting 66 people (July - Sept
2022) of which 32 are unable to work, study or travel. Those with work rights are only in casual or
seasonal work and when stood down are without income. Basic assistance provided by the Society
includes help with accommodation, rent, food, fuel, medical and pharmaceutical needs.
Accommodation is the most difficult problem to resolve due to the acute lack of housing or other
suitable accommodation and unsustainable ongoing rentals. Recent floods have exacerbated these
issues.
While one-off emergency relief payments are available, they do little to prevent people from becoming
homeless, living in over-crowded conditions, or falling into destitution. They are also not able to assist
with ongoing issues related to physical or mental well-being.
Increase spending on SRSS assistance and remove guidelines and policies that restrict access to the
SRSS to
Many refugees and people seeking asylum are suffering enormous disadvantage as a result of the
previous Government’s policies that the Albanese Government has promised to repeal but has not yet
done so. To progress action on most of these issues from 2023-24, an appropriate budget allocation is
needed in the May 2023 Budget.
In short, government costs could be reduced, the skills shortage addressed, and ALP policy
implemented by adopting a different approach to people seeking asylum.
For instance, there are 19,345 people on Safe Haven Enterprise Visa (SHEVs) and Temporary
Protection Visas (TPVs) (April 2022) who could be granted permanent residency. The Kaldor Centre
has made 17 recommendations which could expedite this process and diminish associated costs,
while ensuring fairer treatment. (6)
The previous Government’s process took on average six years and pathways to permanency had
limited success. The estimated cost to Government of reprocessing protection claims is at least $300
million. (7) Further, appeals to the Federal Court involve significant staff and legal resources as
applicants are often self-represented and may have limited English. (8) The ALP has promised to grant
permanent residency to these visa holders. However, no action has been progressed.
Savings from streamlining or ceasing the existing processes could be redirected to the SRSS and to
the provision of improved legal and support services.\
Other savings could be found by granting asylum seekers bridging visas and allowing them to live in
the community. In 2021, the Kaldor Centre estimated the annual cost per person to the Australian
Government of detaining and/or processing refugees and asylum seekers offshore was almost $3.4
million. In contrast, the cost of detention in Australia was $362,000 per person. If the same person was
granted a bridging visa and allowed to live in the community, the cost was $4,429 per person. (9)
An end to mandatory offshore processing and detention would have saved an estimated $800 million
in 2022-23 alone. It would also address concerns expressed in the recent Human Rights Watch
report. (10)
Recent reports have highlighted the lack of affordable housing in Australia and sky-rocketing rental
costs. The reality is that housing options for those on low to middle incomes are rapidly disappearing.
The Society is also aware that housing costs are proportionately much higher for people on low
incomes, especially if renting privately. Rental affordability in metropolitan and regional locations
across eastern Australia has plummeted to record lows.
The recent Report on Government Services 2023 (11) found that almost 44 per cent of low income
households renting privately are in rental stress and were at risk of homelessness, despite receiving
Commonwealth Rent Assistance (CRA).
Two parliamentary inquiries have called for CRA to be increased and independently reviewed, taking
into account the maximum rates, method of indexation and its interaction with other relevant
payments. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) research has found that
improvements to CRA’s eligibility requirements would generate savings that could be redirected to
better assist those in need. This includes the one-third of CRA recipients whose housing costs
currently exceed 30 percent of their income, even after CRA is deducted from rents. This could also
be used to assist the 246,000, or 18 per cent of low-income private renters, who pay rents that exceed
30 per cent of their income but are ineligible for CRA. (12)
The Society supports National Shelter Australia and Australian Council of Social Services’ (ACOSS)
calls to increase to the maximum rate of CRA by 50 percent.
The Society welcomes the Australian Government’s commitment to establish a Housing Australia
Future Fund and develop a National Housing and Homelessness Plan. While we recognise the length
of time it takes to implement significant policy change, more urgent action is needed.
The National Rental Affordability Scheme is winding down, with 32,930 homes to be exited from the
Scheme by 2026. This will push thousands of low-income renters into eviction or higher rents. While the Housing Accord includes funding to incentivise superannuation funds and institutional investors to
invest in the social and affording housing market, too few incentives remain for private market
investment in rental housing.
Thank you for considering our submission. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further
information.
Yours sincerely
Toby oConnor
Chief Executive Officer
1. Coates. Cowgill. 25 February 2021. Now is an especially bad time to cut unemployment benefits. Grattan
Institute.
Accessed at: https://grattan.edu.au/news/now-is-an-especially-bad-time-to-cut-unemploymentbenefits/
2. Azize, M. 2023. Creating Jobs, Creating Opportunity: Tackling long-term unemployment in Australia. Anglicare Australia Canberra.
Accessed at: https://www.anglicare.asn.au/publications/creating-jobs-creating-opportunity/
3. Oxfam Australia. 16 January 2023. Survival of the Richest.
Accessed at: https://media.oxfam.org.au/2023/01/australias-richest-1-gain-10-times-more-wealth-in-past-decade-than-bottom-50-oxfam/
4. Refugee Council of Australia. 25 April 2020. Information about money you can get from the government.
Accessed at: https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/money-info
5. Van Kooy, J., Ward, T., Sept 2018. An Unnecessary Penalty: Economic impacts of changes to the Status
Resolution Support Services. Commissioned by Refugee Council of Australia in partnership with 10 other
community-based organisations.
Accessed at: https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/srss-economic-penalty/2/
6. Kenny, M. Procter. N. Grech.C. June 2022. Temporary Protection Visas in Australia: A reform proposal. Policy Brief 13. UNSW.
Accessed at: extension://elhekieabhbkpmcefcoobjddigjcaadp/https://www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/files/Policy_Brief_13_Temporary_Protection_Visas_Australia_Reform_Proposal.pdf
7. Kooy. J. September 2021. Supporting Economic Growth in Uncertain Times: Permanent Pathways for
Temporary Protection Visa and Safe Haven Enterprise Visa Holders. Policy Options Paper.
Accessed at: https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2021-09/apo-nid314128.pdf, 2
8. 9 Kenny, M. Procter. N. Grech.C. June 2022. Temporary Protection Visas in Australia: A reform proposal. Policy Brief 13. UNSW.
Accessed at: extension://elhekieabhbkpmcefcoobjddigjcaadp/https://www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/kaldorcentre.uns
w.edu.au/files/Policy_Brief_13_Temporary_Protection_Visas_Australia_Reform_Proposal.pdf. p.7
9. Kaldor Centre. 26 April 2022. The Cost of Australia’s Asylum and Refugee Policies: A Source Guide. UNSW.
Accessed at: https://www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/publication/cost-australias-asylumpolicy#:~:text=In%20the%202018-
19%20financial%20year%20the%20annual%20cost%2C,to%20live%20in%20community%20detention%20in%20Australia%3B%20and
10. World Report 2023: Australia. Human Rights Watch.
Accessed at: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2023/country-chapters/australia
11. Australian Government. 24 January 2023. Report on Government Services.
Accessed at: https://www.pc.gov.au/ongoing/report-on-government-services
12. Ong, R., Pawson, H., Singh, R. and Martin, C. 2020. Demand-side assistance in Australia’s rental housing
market: exploring reform option. AHURI Final Report No. 342. Australian Housing and Urban Research
Institute Limited Melbourne.
Accessed at: https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/finalreports/342, doi:10.18408/ahuri8120801.
Share this page